ahci errors on 8-stable

[Nenhum_de_Nos]

On Mon, March 15, 2010 14:21, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos schrieb am 09.03.2010 00:44 (localtime):
>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:26:53 -0800
>> Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd at jdc.parodius.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 06:38:02PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>>>> I've seen these errors in a production machine in deep disk load (scp
>>>> and
>>>> bsdtar in heavy use):
>>> Please provide the output from the following commands:
>>
>> As I had huge disk activity when those messages appeared, I did reboot
>> after and now no more are there. I think the vmstat command should be
>> issued when the problem was happening right ? (if so I can run the
>> backup tar's and see what happens).
>
> What disks do you use?
> I have similar timeouts and mav has the hd firmware in mind to be the
> culprit
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/stable/2010-02/msg00737.html
>
> In my case it's the samsung EcoGreen SpinPouint F2 1.5TB, Firmware
> 1AG01113 and 1AG01118. The disk on ahcich2 (where the timeouts appear)
> has the newer firmware.

2 Seagate 1TB disks:

Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada1 at ahcich1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada1: <ST31000528AS CC38> ATA-8 SATA 2.x
device
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada1: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x,
UDMA6, PIO size 8192bytes)
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada1: Command Queueing enabled
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada1: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte
sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada2 at ahcich3 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada2: <ST31000528AS CC38> ATA-8 SATA 2.x
device
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada2: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x,
UDMA6, PIO size 8192bytes)
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada2: Command Queueing enabled
Mar  8 13:49:45 optimus kernel: ada2: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte
sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)

those are known to be bad ?

thanks,

matheus

> -Harry
>
>


-- 
We will call you cygnus,
The God of balance you shall be

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style