Open Vs Free BSD

[demuel at thephinix.org]

Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa. So why feeding this issue up since up to this very moment,
there is no winner.

> and the security is in netbsd:
>
>  http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?security+8+NetBSD-5.0
>  http://www.netbsd.org/~elad/recent/recent06.pdf
>
> On 6/19/09, Ivan Voras <ivoras at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Kim Attree wrote:
>>
>>> NetBSD runs on just about anything. That's it's primary goal. Since I
>>> don't
>>> have any weird hardware, I've never had a use for NetBSD.
>>
>> I don't use NetBSD either but some recent development that come from
>> that camp are very interesting:
>>
>> * Journalling UFS ("smart" journalling, not gjournal)
>> * PUFFS (BSD implementation of FUSE-like system [file system in
>> userland])
>> * They had Xen dom0 and domU for years
>> * They are starting to show decent results in SMP support, including a
>> new scheduler (a bit similar to ULE); their GENERIC has SMP included
>> * Possibly superpages, I'm not sure how to parse "Merged amd64 and i386
>> pmap. Large pages are always used if available"
>> * I think they are working on their own ZFS port
>> * They have ported or reimplemented Linux LVM (read+write+admin)
>>
>> There are of course other things; see for example
>> http://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal-5/NetBSD-5.0.html
>>
>> I have a feeling the project has been revitalized in the last few years.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>