kostikbel at gmail.com
Thu Aug 20 11:48:46 UTC 2009
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:35:46PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote:
> On 20 Aug 2009, at 12:06, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >>On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Bob Bishop wrote:
> >>>On 20 Aug 2009, at 08:25, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >>>>This is running in 6.2 ish using 4BSD, I was under the impression
> >>>>ULE wasn't very stable in 6.2.
> >>>>I could probably try it though...
> >>>Hmm. ISTR having similar problems around the 6.1-2 era. You might
> >>>try 6.4 if that's possible for you.
> >>Someone is going to visit it, but if I can't solve it remotely I'll
> >>probably just update it to 7.2 or so.
> >What sort of problems did you have BTW?
> Things like ls on the console might take several seconds to respond
> when the box didn't seem to be very busy (but wasn't idle, maybe
> serving a little NFS). It wasn't the shell getting swapped out or
> anything else obvious. This was on SMP, not using X. The problem went
> away with 6.4R (had to stay with 6.x for unrelated reasons).
6.1 was released with a bug in NFS server, causing serious slowdown
when non-MPSAFE fs was exported.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20090820/8f60f8a7/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-stable