ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

[Marc G. Fournier]

On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Mark Linimon wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was
>> that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed
>> stable ...
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/decision-points.html
>
>> but "blantant and obvious bugs due to insufficient testing", IMHO, doesn't
>> classify as an 'oops' ....
>
> You've already made this point -- 3 times.  What would you like us to do
> now, punish the committer?

Huh?  My first post on this thread was in defense of MFCng into STABLE and 
acknowledging that 'mistakes happen', and then this one ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy at hub.org                              MSN . scrappy at hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664