ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

[Mark Linimon]

On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was 
> that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed 
> stable ...

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/decision-points.html

> but "blantant and obvious bugs due to insufficient testing", IMHO, doesn't
> classify as an 'oops' ....

You've already made this point -- 3 times.  What would you like us to do
now, punish the committer?

Simply reiterating your criticism and unhappiness isn't going to do anything
to fix this problem (for which, of course, a fix has already been made), or
the next one(s) either.

It was an error, it's been fixed, may I suggest we move on to the next bug?

mcl