Do anyone has any problem with sem_open() crash?

[Jeremy Messenger]

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:01:19 -0500, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org>  
wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:48:20PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
>> I guess I am safe then as I can ignore these cores.. Thanks! Isn't  
>> kernel
>> supposed to be avoid the crash? I don't see any of crash before I  
>> upgraded
>> to last night of RELENG_6.
>
> It's not a crash, it's a configure script testing whether the syscall
> exists, and the the test program gets the signal 12 to tell it that it
> doesn't. This is expected behaviour.

Ok, thanks for explain.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Kris


-- 
mezz7 at cox.net  -  mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team  -  FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gnome at FreeBSD.org
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia  -  multimedia at FreeBSD.org