Do anyone has any problem with sem_open() crash?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:48:20PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:

> I guess I am safe then as I can ignore these cores.. Thanks! Isn't kernel  
> supposed to be avoid the crash? I don't see any of crash before I upgraded  
> to last night of RELENG_6.

It's not a crash, it's a configure script testing whether the syscall
exists, and the the test program gets the signal 12 to tell it that it
doesn't. This is expected behaviour.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20061023/8d3590bf/attachment.pgp