Performance problem since updating from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE last friday

[Hajimu UMEMOTO]

Hi,

>>>>> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
>>>>> Nate Lawson <nate at root.org> said:

nate> Thank you for tracking this down.  It is interesting that BIF is 
nate> heavyweight while BST is not.  I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs 
nate> which only test on Windows and so not everyone makes BIF simple.  On my 
nate> laptops, BIF is as fast as BST.

You are welcome.  My laptops are also fast enough for BIF.  I
remembered that iwasaki-san grouched at the heavyweight of BIF when he
was writing cmbat support.

nate> I don't like the patch approach (changing the API), however.  Let me 
nate> look at it and commit a fix that doesn't change the API.

Yes, I didn't feel satisfaction with my patch, too.  So, I anticipated
that you say so. :-)

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/