Performance problem since updating from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE last friday

[Pierre-Luc Drouin]

Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:

>Hi,
>
>  
>
>>>>>>On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
>>>>>>Nate Lawson <nate at root.org> said:
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>
>nate> Thank you for tracking this down.  It is interesting that BIF is 
>nate> heavyweight while BST is not.  I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs 
>nate> which only test on Windows and so not everyone makes BIF simple.  On my 
>nate> laptops, BIF is as fast as BST.
>
>You are welcome.  My laptops are also fast enough for BIF.  I
>remembered that iwasaki-san grouched at the heavyweight of BIF when he
>was writing cmbat support.
>
>nate> I don't like the patch approach (changing the API), however.  Let me 
>nate> look at it and commit a fix that doesn't change the API.
>
>Yes, I didn't feel satisfaction with my patch, too.  So, I anticipated
>that you say so. :-)
>
>Sincerely,
>
>--
>Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
>ume at mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
>http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
>
>  
>
Is it that much related to laptop performance? Because the M70 I have is 
currently the fastest laptop made by Dell and cmbat makes it to hang on 
FreeBSD...