make release without a lot of the base system

[Jacques A. Vidrine]

On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> First, should even kerberos be built with the NO* options above? 

No, it should not.  Defining NOCRYPT or NO_OPENSSL will prevent the
kerberosIV directory from being entered during the build.

[...]
> Second, I have tried adding MAKE_KERBEROS4=no to make.conf but that doesn't
> appear to make a difference. What's the correct option in /etc/make.conf to
> skip building kerberos 4 and 5?

Don't do that.  The correct option is not to define MAKE_KERBEROS[45]
at all.  The value does not matter ... if it is defined, it will be
read as `make it please'.

I would guess that your flags aren't getting propogated as you think.
*shrug*

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar at celabo.org>          http://www.celabo.org/
NTT/Verio SME          .     FreeBSD UNIX     .       Heimdal Kerberos
jvidrine at verio.net     .  nectar at FreeBSD.org  .          nectar at kth.se