fstack protector

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 09:52:34AM -0400, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> > Yes, it was to do with module loading.  I think the XFree86 module
> > build ignored CFLAGS, so the modules were not built with
> > -fstack-protector.
> 
> The modules use MODCFLAGS and MODULE_CFLAGS instead. I'm familair with
> the XFree86 loader, and would be willing to work with someone familiar with
> the -fstack-protector part to fix this.

Hmm, OK.  From the point of view of the FreeBSD port this is a POLA
violation..it should just use CFLAGS like everything else is supposed
to.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/attachments/20030419/a82c8288/attachment.bin