fstack protector

[Stuart Anderson]

On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> Yes, it was to do with module loading.  I think the XFree86 module
> build ignored CFLAGS, so the modules were not built with
> -fstack-protector.

The modules use MODCFLAGS and MODULE_CFLAGS instead. I'm familair with
the XFree86 loader, and would be willing to work with someone familiar with
the -fstack-protector part to fix this.


                                Stuart

Stuart R. Anderson                               anderson at netsweng.com
Network & Software Engineering                   http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149:                                  0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
                                                 BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149