Status of migration to ruby 1.9 as default

[Steve Wills]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/06/11 22:57, Steve Wills wrote:
> On 07/06/11 22:39, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:28:00 -0400
>> Steve Wills <swills at FreeBSD.org> mentioned:
> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In case anyone is interested, here's where we are with migrating to Ruby
>>> 1.9 as the default version:
> 
>> Thanks for a nice summary.  Seems like a lot of work has been done.
> 
>> So when do you want to make the switch?  I'm still not sure it's the
>> right time to do it as part of 9.0 release cycle, as it seems that some
>> of the important ports are broken and people still using 1.8 for production
>> (myself included).
> 
> IMHO, the sooner the better. There will be some fallout, but at the
> moment, the rdoc port is broken and thus railties and rails as well.
> 

I take it back about rdoc. I missed a commit and it's fixed. But,
railties and rails are still not working as far as I know.

Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOFSLsAAoJEPXPYrMgexuh7MsH/1U+4eXES/LwoxPcW60CLaeE
HF5lS6uVQ4Y4A7IhkHC5cHwZfoGRxl770muy18fuBUhGOCjsiq2XR1c7wWtnPSw8
f0fNXCNBlxi6OKFDFlCusbG/b36NrgL0SvsEqc9U3ee78T1fAeTs+NDmFe9KwVCC
CCkbGOFD3Fl0iqHAgoCdSei+VYMG9gqohYZD/Jkiirm6J0HaezVmPKlA4bYGzPtV
c5fXMzRg+ygSWRWhypFMnJe4VXq/7fFnS5yAax8MWyIdxTW9t1wodLRhFaDMXN+A
vViloEBs1oaFFoHU+B3jUQ8oAUYFQ9oJRbTxAG4W6aJ7jna410EAcLRCxutk4Tc=
=MT1h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----