Fast personal printing _without_ CUPS

Robert Bonomi bonomi at mail.r-bonomi.com
Fri Oct 28 22:27:03 UTC 2011


On  Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:54:01 -0400 Jerry <jerry at seibercom.net> supersciliously
ponftificated:
>
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:35:20 -0500 (CDT)
> Robert Bonomi articulated:
>
> > 
> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:04:19 -0400, Jerry <jerry at seibercom.net>
> > pontificated:
> > >
> > > I buy my cars from known corporations and not the local chop-shop.
> > > My drugs come form known pharmaceutical corporations and not the
> > > local pusher. I like my device specific codes to come from those
> > > best able to supply them, the OEM.
> > 
> > "I am just going to reply to this one point because it is where
> > you(sic) entire argument breaks down."
> > 
> > That attitude is entirely acceptable for _your_ decision making.
> > Asserting that nobody else shoul(sic) have any other alternatives to
> > what you think is 'acceptable' is downright fascist.
>
> Who, or is it whom you choose to be your supplier is entirely a
> decision you have to make based on your needs and desires. My point is
> that anyone offering such products should be to some degree held
> legally responsible to their worth.

Of course, _every_ piece of freeware comes with a 100% satisfaction guarantee.
If you don't like it, for _any_reason_whatsoever_, your money will be 
immediately refunded, in full.  You don't even have to return the (in your 
view) "defective", product -- or even stop using it.

>                                     A "Fly by Night" operation is
> totally unacceptable to me. If you find it acceptable then so be it.
> Remember the adage: "You get what you pay for."
>
> By the way, calling me a Fascist when a significant number of users
> of Open Source are socialist is rather funny.

What 'some others' are, and what _you_ are, are unrelated subjects.

Your insistance on trying to impose -your- standards on the world, and
denying them the 'freedom of choice' to make their own decisions on the
matter -- e.g. "anyone offering such products should be to some degree 
held legally responsible to their worth" -- is a fascist mind-set.
You 'know better' than anybody else, what is 'right' _for_ them.  <snort>

BTW, I'd _love_ to see Microsoft "held legally respnsible" for _their_
product shortcomings.  They'd be out of business in a week at the outside.


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list