am i back up....???

[Arthur Chance]

On 04/04/11 01:15, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:37:50AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:46:26 -0600, Chad Perrin<perrin at apotheon.com>  wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 03:43:59AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For example, you could install an IMAP interface for mail stored on
>>>> the server, so you can access it by any IMAP capable client you
>>>> want, and you could even install a web mail client (e. g.
>>>> roundcube) to bind to that IMAP inter- face. In my opinion, this is
>>>> way better than the POP/no-SMTP thing I'm currently doing.
>>>
>>> Why Roundcube?  From what I've seen, it doesn't handle quote
>>> indentation and marking properly.
>>
>> Why not? :-)
>
> Please tell me why you would want to inflict this kind of behavior on
> others:
>
>      >  >  >
>      >  >  >  For example, you could install an IMAP interface for mail
>      stored on
>      >  >  >  the server, so you can access it by any IMAP capable client you
>      >  >  >  want, and you could even install a web mail client (e. g.
>      >  >  >  roundcube) to bind to that IMAP inter- face. In my opinion,
>      this is
>      >  >  >  way better than the POP/no-SMTP thing I'm currently doing.
>
> I've seen Roundcube do this crap.  It does *not* make me happy when
> trying to skim through emails quickly -- and it can be bad when reading
> more closely, too.

In the near future I'm probably going to have to implement a web mail 
system for times when my clients are travelling and don't have access to 
an IMAP capable client. If Roundcube isn't a decent solution, what is?