IPF, NAT or NIC
Freeco
freeco at inbox.lv
Fri Sep 18 14:16:19 UTC 2009
Steve Bertrand wrote:
[ snip ]
> Freeco, let us know how things are connected physically. Your best bet
> would be:
>
> |---------<pc>
> |
> ISP>-----------<Gateway>-----<Switch>-----<pc>
> |
> |_________<pc>
|-------------<pc>
|
ISP>-----<Switch>---<Gateway>--<Switch>----<pc>
| \ |
| \ |_____________<pc>
| \
<server1> <server2>
Steve wrote:
...Not depicted, but I'd recommend a firewall for anything between the
gateway and the ISP.
The gateway will work like IPF (Firewall) and NAT. Is it wrong?
Steve wrote:
I just noticed that your ISP has assigned you a /28 prefix.
Is all of this 255.255.255.240 yours, or are you on a shared network
segment? If it is yours, and you plan on using it, you'll want to set
things up like the following. If it is all yours (88.18 - 88.30) and you
didn't request it, I'd sure be interested to know who is giving away
/28's nowadays when the client didn't even request it ;)
Yes, it's mine. I'm paying just for 3 static addresses 18-20. I plan other
static addresses to use for other plans. So i'll need 2 more NIC's for
gateway?
I think that my ISP uses the 2nd image. In my room is a switch. In our home
is switch. 3 homes from mine is a gateway. I don't know what else there is.
P.S. Sorry for my poor english
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25509501.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list