FreeBSD system update killing PostFix links?
Tim Hogan
tim at hoganzoo.com
Sun Apr 17 05:19:46 PDT 2005
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>On 2005-04-16 21:10, Tim Hogan <tim at hoganzoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I have recently done a system update to address some security issues and
>>discovered that during the update the soft links in my /usr/sbin directory
>>were re-written back to the system defaults. I believe that I have changed
>>the mailq, sendmail, and newaliases soft links back to what they should be,
>>but is there a way to verify the postfix installation? Is there a way to
>>keep FreeBSD from doing this during a build world?
>>
>>
>
>What you are trying to accomplish with those soft links can be done in a very
>easier manner if you use mailer.conf(5). Let those soft links be as they
>should *really* be (the way installworld sets them up), and edit your
>/etc/mail/mailer.conf file to invoke Postfix.
>
>Alternatively, if you are truly convinced that mailer.conf(5) is not good for
>you, you may find a look at the description of NO_SENDMAIL and NO_MAILWRAPPER
>in make.conf(5) very interesting :-)
>
>
I edited the /etc/mail/mailer.conf before I did the last update and it
did not seem to work. I think that I will try the NO_SENDMAIL option in
the make.conf file and see what happens. One question though, the
NO_MAILWRAPPER option will keep the system from building the mail
wrapping application but do I need to worry about that since I am using
the NO_SENDMAIL option? Will it still try to make softlinks?
Regards,
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3166 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050417/8f57b0c8/smime.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list