Installing portupgrade without X.org

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Sat Apr 9 14:43:22 PDT 2005


On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:37:22PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote:
> On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson <lewiz at compsoc.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote:
> >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by
> >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after
> >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts
> >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a
> >> download for X.org.
> >
> > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port.  Which specific
> > port?  In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf.
> 
> I think it is
> 
> WITHOUT_X11="YES"
> 
> Does it make any difference?

No, the value for such variables is unimportant (WITHOUT_X11="NO"
works just as well)

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050409/eac7baeb/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list