Installing portupgrade without X.org

[Pat Maddox]

The only thing that matters is that WITHOUT_X11 is defined.  The value
itself doesn't matter.



On Apr 9, 2005 2:37 PM, Sergei Gnezdov <use-reply-to at gnezdov.net> wrote:
> On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson <lewiz at compsoc.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote:
> >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by
> >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after
> >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts
> >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a
> >> download for X.org.
> >
> > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port.  Which specific
> > port?  In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf.
> 
> I think it is
> 
> WITHOUT_X11="YES"
> 
> Does it make any difference?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>