NFS v2? possible?

[Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC]

On Nov 9, 2003, at 11:51 PM, Miguel Mendez wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 22:32:38 -0700
> "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad at shire.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> It seems to be ok.  I don't know what the problem is, but it seems to
>> be on the Linux end as I run mountd and portmap with verbose
>> debugging, as appropriate to each, and mountd immediately returns a
>> "mount successful" but Liunx take 10 minutes to return from the mount
>> command.
>
> You probably want to use the 'nolock' option in Linux, that solved it
> from me.
>

Thanks, I'll check.  I did solve the problem though.  The "runlevel" 
was set to be one less than full multi user mode which supposedly 
excluded nfs and I found a log file complaining about the client 
portmap daemon so I fixed that...  Just got to get a new kernel to 
support v3 and do some tuning and we should be ok.

thanks
Chad


> Cheers,
> -- 
> 	Miguel Mendez <flynn at energyhq.es.eu.org>
> 	http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org