Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??

[Mateusz Piotrowski]

On 2/27/20 3:54 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
>> On 2/26/20 3:20 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
>>>> On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>>>> ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by 
>>>>> "timidity"
>>>>>
>>>>> pkg install libarc
>>>>
>>>> It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not 
>>>> included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the 
>>>> timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
>>>>
>>>> I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this 
>>>> way.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of 
>>>> the timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.
>>>
>>> And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?
>>
>> It is a valid port. I am not sure why libarc is not a run-time 
>> dependency here. Maybe just an oversight.
>
> Maybe there is some bug with
>
> .if !defined(PKGNAMESUFFIX)
>
> during package building?
No idea...