Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??

[Marcin Cieslak]

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:

> On 2/26/20 3:20 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
>>> On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>>> ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by 
>>>> "timidity"
>>>> 
>>>> pkg install libarc
>>> 
>>> It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not 
>>> included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the 
>>> timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
>>> 
>>> I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this way.
>>> 
>>> Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of the 
>>> timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
>>> 
>> 
>> No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.
>> 
>> And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?
>
> It is a valid port. I am not sure why libarc is not a run-time dependency 
> here. Maybe just an oversight.

Maybe there is some bug with

.if !defined(PKGNAMESUFFIX)

during package building?

Marcin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3663 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20200227/92e960fe/attachment.bin>