CFD: status of Ada-related ports (including ports-mgmt/synth)
Gerald Pfeifer
gerald at pfeifer.com
Mon Feb 3 12:38:10 UTC 2020
[ I found this in my outgoing folder; ahem. ]
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Mark Linimon wrote:
> As of the following commit, lang/gcc6 is no longer supported:
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?revision=521584
GCC 6 hasn't been supported upstream for over a year (end of life)
and is not covered by Mk/bsd.gcc.mk (aka USE_GCC) any longer. The
port is still in our tree for the time being, though I marked it for
expiration end of February - which gives an extra day this year. ;-)
> I would like to, if possible, eliminate gcc6, as it merely adds
> build time on the package builders.
Is this a concern for all architectures, or mostly non-x86? We
can always restrict ONLY_FOR_ARCHS further for such ports if those
focusing on those architectures are in favor.
[ Editorial note: In the meantime I made such a change for lang/gcc48. ]
> There is a variant of lang/gcc6 called lang/gcc6-aux, which is now only
> required for the Ada-related ports, including ports-mgmt/synth. fwiw,
> that port is only available for aarch64/amd64/i386.
>
> Is anyone willing to take on the work to upgrade our Ada support to
> some later compiler, so that we can delete lang/gcc6-aux as well?
lang/gcc6-aux/files carries a lot of patches (2500+ lines) that I
don't believe should be FreeBSD-local, but upstreamable/upstreamed.
Also there are some small local patches, some backports, in lang/gcc7
and later especially, that really matter. Any FreeBSD port around GCC
probably would want to use those - which is not the case right now.
Gerald
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list