FreeBSD Port: py27-qt5-core / Py36-qt5-core

Pete Wright pete at nomadlogic.org
Tue Mar 27 22:00:10 UTC 2018



On 03/27/2018 14:49, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/27/18 22:44, D.-C. M. wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
> Hi!
>
>>   
>>
>> At this moment, it is impossible to build side by side py27-qt5-core and
>> py36-qt5-core.
>>
>>   
>>
>> There is a collison on /usr/local/bin/pyuic
>>
>>   
>>
>> This is annoying… Python 27 is still the default, but become quite old now.
>>
> I'm not a python expert, but I understand that python 2.7 and python 3
> are two slightly different languages not fully compatible with each other.
>
> I also understand(but have not gone into depth about this) that there is
> some resistance to python 3, with many developers being reluctant to
> move to version 3, for whatever reason(I imagine it's language design
> choices, but I really don't know)
>
> I'm stating this because it means such incompatibilities are not going
> away easily. It's not just a ports system problem, but an actual python
> ecosystem problem.
>
> Too say it in other words, python 2.7 isn't really just "the old
> version" and python 3 is not just "the new version". They have parallel
> lifes.

I'm not %100 sure that's really an accurate assessment of the slow 
uptake in Python3.  Regardless, the clock is ticking on the 2.x codebase 
as it is reaching EOL status in 2020:

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0373/

Hopefully a solid deadline (which has already been pushed back) will 
motivate developers to accelerate the task of migrating to py3 sooner 
rather than later.

-pete

-- 
Pete Wright
pete at nomadlogic.org
@nomadlogicLA



More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list