ClamAV Port Version Regression?

[Janky Jay, III]

Perfect! Thanks for the replies and the clarification, guys!

On 12/11/18 11:21 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 11.12.18 um 18:51 schrieb Janky Jay, III:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> 	After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
>>
>> clamav-0.101.0_2                   <   needs updating (index has 0.100.2,1)
>>
>> 	The version that is claiming to be the latest appears to be a version
>> regression. Am I wrong here? I checked the ClamAV site and it appears
>> version 0.101.0 is, in fact, the latest. So, I'm wondering if there was
>> possibly a revision issue that's causing this?
> 
> The ,1 at the end of the port to be installed indicates a new port epoch,
> which is used to enforce an "upgrade" to a lower version number.
> 
> This is typically done if a port upgrade has been revoked due to problems
> with the new version.
> 
> In this particular case the commit log says:
> 
> r487064 | antoine | 2018-12-09 18:33:26 +0100 (Sun, 09 Dec 2018) | 6 lines
> 
> Downgrade to 0.100.2
> Upstream plans to release version 0.101.1 which fixes header issues in January
> 2019
> 
> Regards, STefan
> 

Regards,
Janky Jay, III

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20181212/cc745687/attachment.sig>