ClamAV Port Version Regression?

[Stefan Esser]

Am 11.12.18 um 18:51 schrieb Janky Jay, III:
> Hi All,
> 
> 	After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
> 
> clamav-0.101.0_2                   <   needs updating (index has 0.100.2,1)
> 
> 	The version that is claiming to be the latest appears to be a version
> regression. Am I wrong here? I checked the ClamAV site and it appears
> version 0.101.0 is, in fact, the latest. So, I'm wondering if there was
> possibly a revision issue that's causing this?

The ,1 at the end of the port to be installed indicates a new port epoch,
which is used to enforce an "upgrade" to a lower version number.

This is typically done if a port upgrade has been revoked due to problems
with the new version.

In this particular case the commit log says:

r487064 | antoine | 2018-12-09 18:33:26 +0100 (Sun, 09 Dec 2018) | 6 lines

Downgrade to 0.100.2
Upstream plans to release version 0.101.1 which fixes header issues in January
2019

Regards, STefan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20181211/f9f69090/attachment.sig>