raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING?

[Raphael Kubo da Costa]

Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco at FreeBSD.org> writes:

> Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>
>> Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
>> or if the code can't include <raptor2/raptor.h>, or if
>> -I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before
>> -I/usr/local/include.
>
> Everything built fine without the {CPP,LD}FLAGS additions here. I'm
> tempted to commit that change, but wonder if it will end up breaking
> some weird setup...

Coming to think of it again, removing those lines changing {CPP,LD}FLAGS
would have an impact if one is using openssl from ports, as the check
for MD5() in libcrypto.so would be done for the library in base, not
${LOCALBASE}.