raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING?

[Raphael Kubo da Costa]

Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco at FreeBSD.org> writes:

> Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
> or if the code can't include <raptor2/raptor.h>, or if
> -I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before
> -I/usr/local/include.

Everything built fine without the {CPP,LD}FLAGS additions here. I'm
tempted to commit that change, but wonder if it will end up breaking
some weird setup...