.if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'?

[Chris Rees]

On 10 Apr 2012 10:33, "Michael Scheidell" <scheidell at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/10/12 5:16 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>>
>> maintainer that something is wrong.
>>
>> There are quite a few large grey areas between those, but that's the
>> general outline.
>
> so, if the maintainer knows something, and knows it won't ever get fixed,
then 'NOT_FOR_ARCHS' is best,
> if its an unknown/ maybe osversion, something the maintainer didn't know
about, portmgr might mark it broken wrapped in a .if ${ARCH}.
>
>

Yes. Bsd.port.options.mk is required beforehand of course.

Chris