.if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'?

[Michael Scheidell]

On 4/10/12 5:16 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> maintainer that something is wrong.
>
> There are quite a few large grey areas between those, but that's the
> general outline.
so, if the maintainer knows something, and knows it won't ever get 
fixed, then 'NOT_FOR_ARCHS' is best,
if its an unknown/ maybe osversion, something the maintainer didn't know 
about, portmgr might mark it broken wrapped in a .if ${ARCH}.


-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
 >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell