portupgrade -f advice please
David Southwell
david at vizion2000.net
Sat Jan 1 14:42:16 UTC 2011
> David Southwell writes:
> > A bit puzzled
> >
> > I have a problem with apache22 loading and decided before doing
> > anything else that I would upgrade apache22 recursively to
> > rebuild all ports upon which it depened and which depend upon
> > apache.
> >
> > The (to me) logical command was:
> >
> > dns1# portupgrade -frR apache22
> >
> > Which generated the following:
> > [Exclude up-to-date packages done]
> >
> > Man portupgrade shows:
> > -f
> >
> > --force Force the upgrade of a package even if it is
> > to be
> >
> > a downgrade or just a reinstall of the same
> > ver- sion, or the port is held by user
> > using the HOLD_PKGS variable in
> > pkgtools.conf.
> >
> > I do not want to exclude packages that appear to be
> > up-to-date. Where is this limitation on force set?
>
> Assuming the reoirt if generated output is verbatim, I beleive
> this is behaving as you desire. Usually the "Excluding up-to-date
> packages" line includes what I believe is one dot per package so
> excluded.
> I would argue a better notification would be something like:
>
> 'R' and 'f' options specifed - skipping up-to-date dependency checks.
>
>
> Robert Huff
No I am wanting to force an upgrade to all packages irrespective as to whether
they are up to date.
What is happening is that no packages are being upgraded!
The only response I am getting is for portupgrade to skip the upgrade of all
packages on the grounds they are "up to date".
man portupgrade says -f forces the upgrade of the packages EVEN IF it is a
reinstall of the same version. I want all the nominated ports and all the
ports affected by -rR to be forced to upgrade.
David
Photographic Artist
Permanent Installations & Design
Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques
High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture
Combined darkroom & digital creations
& Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list