screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

[matt donovan]

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, matt donovan <kitchetech at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan <kitchetech at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci <
>> pgollucci at p6m7g8.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Josh Rickmar wrote:
>> >> > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc.
>> >> > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both
>> do
>> >> > the exact same thing? (tmux is even designed to be a BSD-licensed
>> >> > replacement for screen.)
>> >> >
>> >> Does anyone have any thoughts on tmux vs screen ?  the NO_PACKAGE in
>> >> screen has been annoying me for years now if I can find a good
>> >> replacement I'm so there.
>> >>
>> > tmux does not work inside the shell due to sc. But in  X it works
>> wonders.
>>
>> tmux works just fine at a console without X running.
>>
>>
>>
> hmm odd since last time I asked about it it did not since I m the one that
> brought it up, since I had an error and was told that the sc does not
> support that feature what freebsd are you running since I tired it in 7.x.
>

forgot something unless of coruse your using a term change trick that I
suggested to the author of tmux.