screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

[matt donovan]

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan <kitchetech at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci <
> pgollucci at p6m7g8.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Josh Rickmar wrote:
> >> > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc.
> >> > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both do
> >> > the exact same thing? (tmux is even designed to be a BSD-licensed
> >> > replacement for screen.)
> >> >
> >> Does anyone have any thoughts on tmux vs screen ?  the NO_PACKAGE in
> >> screen has been annoying me for years now if I can find a good
> >> replacement I'm so there.
> >>
> > tmux does not work inside the shell due to sc. But in  X it works
> wonders.
>
> tmux works just fine at a console without X running.
>
>
>
hmm odd since last time I asked about it it did not since I m the one that
brought it up, since I had an error and was told that the sc does not
support that feature what freebsd are you running since I tired it in 7.x.