autoconf/automake guru wanted [gnuplot-4.0 with patches]

[RW]

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:48:13 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7 at cox.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:29:22 -0500, RW <fbsd06 at mlists.homeunix.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:51:18 -0700
> > Ted Thomas <tthomas at cosmozilla.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm sorry if this sounds like a complaint. I just spent 2 days
> >> attempting to salvage a sane 6.2 development box which does not use
> >> X-Windows, because I stumbled into the Xorg quagmire. Recognizing
> >> that the ports system is itself a remarkable achievement, I would
> >> distill my concern down to one thing: naming conventions.
> >>
> >> Example 1: autoconf/automake
> >>
> >>     autoconf-2.59_3                     =   up-to-date with port
> >>     autoconf-2.61_2                     =   up-to-date with port
> > These two are no problem, they are different ports.
> >
> >>     autoconf-wrapper-20070404           =   up-to-date with port
> >> ..
> >>     automake-wrapper-20070404           =   up-to-date with port
> >
> > This shouldn't happen, do you have multiple entries in /var/db/pkg?
> 
> Did you misread it? :-) The *-wrapper is correct and normal.
> 

Yes, I just saw auto****-wrapper-20070404 twice. 

In that case there's no issue here at all.