autoconf/automake guru wanted [gnuplot-4.0 with patches]
mezz7 at cox.net
Tue Sep 18 09:44:37 PDT 2007
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:29:22 -0500, RW <fbsd06 at mlists.homeunix.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:51:18 -0700
> Ted Thomas <tthomas at cosmozilla.net> wrote:
>> I'm sorry if this sounds like a complaint. I just spent 2 days
>> attempting to salvage a sane 6.2 development box which does not use
>> X-Windows, because I stumbled into the Xorg quagmire. Recognizing
>> that the ports system is itself a remarkable achievement, I would
>> distill my concern down to one thing: naming conventions.
>> Example 1: autoconf/automake
>> autoconf-2.59_3 = up-to-date with port
>> autoconf-2.61_2 = up-to-date with port
> These two are no problem, they are different ports.
>> autoconf-wrapper-20070404 = up-to-date with port
>> automake-wrapper-20070404 = up-to-date with port
> This shouldn't happen, do you have multiple entries in /var/db/pkg?
Did you misread it? :-) The *-wrapper is correct and normal.
# pkg_info -IX wrapper
autoconf-wrapper-20070404 Wrapper script for GNU autoconf
automake-wrapper-20070404 Wrapper script for GNU automake
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-ports