Who marked ksh93 unfetchable and did not tell me?
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Tue Jan 31 11:06:37 PST 2006
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:18:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 23:58 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:24:54PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > > Someone marked ksh93 unfetchable without sending me a notice. ksh93 is
> > > NOT unfetchable, just the automatic script that checks for fetchability
> > > is broken and cannot fetch ksh93.
> >
> > No, I sent you mail on Friday. Perhaps you're still blocking my
> > emails?
>
> My filter either did not work or the message had some other error. Did
> the subject contain the string "ksh"?
Yes.
> > > Whoever is running the port fetchability script needs to remove ksh93
> > > from the test. ksh93 is always fetchable and always will be fetchable.
> >
> > No, it is not fetchable.
>
> I have updated the port. Install the update and everything should work
> fine.
Thanks.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060131/e6e9b5d3/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list