USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk?

[Oliver Eikemeier]

Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> On Monday 03 May 2004 17:51, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> 
>>On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>>
>>>Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>>
>>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
>>>>maintainers serves no purpose?
>>>
>>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
>>>including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not.
>>
>>No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry
>>*after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time.
> 
> ...at least this _used_ to work when I made the port, it doesn't anymore. :-/

  <http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk#rev1.365>