USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk?
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Mon May 3 10:50:17 PDT 2004
On Monday 03 May 2004 18:31, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Monday 03 May 2004 17:51, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >>On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> >>>Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
> >>>>maintainers serves no purpose?
> >>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
> >>>including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not.
> >>No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in
> >> security/pinentry *after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time.
> > ...at least this _used_ to work when I made the port, it doesn't anymore.
> > :-/
*sigh* *fetches the pointy hat*
Fun stuff nobody ever complained (except arved@ on IRC, heh).
I'm going to turn pinentry into a masterport with slaves for the individual
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
More information about the freebsd-ports