mozilla-devel

[Adam Weinberger]

>> (02.15.2004 @ 1330 PST): Alex Zbyslaw said, in 1.5K: <<
> If I understand right, Adam is saying that there can't be two ports 
> "mozilla-1.6", but wasn't Brandon's suggestion to make the devel port 
> called "mozilla-devel-1.6", then there aren't two ports with the same name 
> and version?
> 
> There seem to be precedents for this e.g. xemacs-devel-21.5.b15, 
> gqview-devel-1.3.7 and others.
> 
> If the port were called mozilla-devel, presumably it could either just 
> point to mozilla, or it could duplicate it (which might make it easier to 
> maintain when a new devel release does come along).
>> end of "Re: mozilla-devel" from Alex Zbyslaw <<

You might notice that the rest of the message to which you were replying was
an explanation of how to do exactly that.

# Adam


--
Adam Weinberger
adam at vectors.cx // adamw at FreeBSD.org // adamw at magnesium.net
http://www.vectors.cx