Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
Ivan Voras
ivoras at freebsd.org
Mon Jan 10 12:49:22 UTC 2011
- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 07/01/2011 16:23, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Having in mind that a SAS enterprise disk normally can handle 150-180IOPS, this benchmark is testing something else ;)
It depends - since ZFS is logging all the time it doesn't have to seek
as much; if all transactions are WRITE and given sequentially, they will
be written to the drive sequentially, even with full fsync semantics.
But 75k IOPS is a bit too much :)
- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list