Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
Stefan Lambrev
stefan.lambrev at moneybookers.com
Fri Jan 7 15:40:05 UTC 2011
- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Hi,
Having in mind that a SAS enterprise disk normally can handle 150-180IOPS, this benchmark is testing something else ;)
Well there is a one thing which is clear from almost every Phoronix benchmark - Linux is heavily optimized ... for unpacking the linux kernel :)
On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
> The results came out like this:
>
> EXT3 - ~3000 tps
> EXT4 - ~3800 tps
> XFS - ~ 1800 tps
> ZFS - 75000 tps
--
Best Wishes,
Stefan Lambrev
ICQ# 24134177
- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list