BPF_MISC+BPF_COP and BPF_COPX
Adrian Chadd
adrian at freebsd.org
Mon Aug 5 00:11:41 UTC 2013
On 4 August 2013 15:54, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind at netbsd.org> wrote:
> Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> I think it's slightly unfair to propose a new extension for BPF
>> without any in-tree users.
>>
>
> We have in-tree user in NetBSD as mentioned in the previous email:
Ah, cool. I missed that.
>> > It provides us a capability to offload more complex packet processing.
>> > My primary user would be NPF in NetBSD, e.g. one of the operations is to
>> > lookup an IP address in a table/ipset.
>
> I would like to coordinate the reservation of BPF opcodes though.
That's a good idea. I have no problem with that.
-adrian
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list