BPF_MISC+BPF_COP and BPF_COPX
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
rmind at netbsd.org
Sun Aug 4 22:54:36 UTC 2013
Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
> I think it's slightly unfair to propose a new extension for BPF
> without any in-tree users.
>
We have in-tree user in NetBSD as mentioned in the previous email:
> > It provides us a capability to offload more complex packet processing.
> > My primary user would be NPF in NetBSD, e.g. one of the operations is to
> > lookup an IP address in a table/ipset.
I would like to coordinate the reservation of BPF opcodes though.
--
Mindaugas
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list