lagg problems on diskless client

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2012-Apr-03 14:51:57 +0300, Beeblebrox <zaphod at berentweb.com> wrote:
>Slightly different point of view: Under this scenario of dikless clients
>having dual NICs would CRAP be a choice to consider? From what I have read
>it can offer loadbalancing but as I understand it's not really applicable
>to diskless node situations?

(Two amusing typos in one sentence).

Based on what you've said so far, no.
carp provides load-balancing or failover between two (or more) hosts.
lagg provides load-balancing or failover between two (or more) NICs
on one host.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/attachments/20120403/879e62c0/attachment.pgp