IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?

[Andrey V. Elsukov]

On 03.08.16 22:07, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> 
>>> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most
>>> important for me. (store-state)?
>>> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less important
>>> for me.
>> So, if there are nobody against, I plan to commit this part in a several
>> days.
>  Which implementation? Just curious, I could live with any, really.

This one
https://people.freebsd.org/~ae/ipfw.diff

but with separate opcodes, I  have come to the opinion, that this will
be more readable.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 559 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/attachments/20160803/84110376/attachment.sig>