IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11?

[Lev Serebryakov]

On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:

>> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most
>> important for me. (store-state)?
>> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less important
>> for me.
> So, if there are nobody against, I plan to commit this part in a several
> days.
 Which implementation? Just curious, I could live with any, really.

-- 
// Lev Serebryakov

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/attachments/20160803/9809bbc9/attachment.sig>