[CFR] Remove texinfo from base

John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell johnandsara2 at cox.net
Thu Jul 10 23:58:16 UTC 2014


Warner Losh wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:20:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> On Jun 25, 2014, at 4:00 AM, Matthew D. Fuller <fullermd at over-yonder.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:52:10PM +0200 I heard the voice of
>>>> Baptiste Daroussin, and lo! it spake thus:
>>>>> I have just committed the support for this in ports, anyway breakage
>>>>> should be reported, right now it seems fine on my exp-run
>>>> Oh, yes.  Sorry, I did phrase that poorly.  This shouldn't _break_
>>>> anything, but I suspect it will uncover existing-but-hidden breakage.
>>>>
>>>> Which is good.  But does merit awareness that "hey, this will probably
>>>> happen somewhere, so know this is a place to look when a build
>>>> breaks".
>>> I know it will break certain nanobsd configurations that build ports because
>>> dependencies there (at least for the ones I’ve done) aren’t well handled. So
>>> I agree that this patch is missing, at the very least, an UPDATING entry and
>>> a __FreeBSD_version bump.
>> If you build a port that needs texinfo the port framework will do what it needs
> 
> Except in environments that don’t do dependencies quite right, or where only a subset
> of ports tree has been imported and texinfo isn’t part of that…  But people with them
> usually know, which is why UPDATING is needed. That’s all. There’s nothing else for you
> to do.
> 
> Warner

i a few times heard there was and IS a long standing stand-off between 
info(1) and man(1) because man was copyright at least in part and 
further reasons that were not discussed.

remove the ability to look at existing info pages of say m4.info why?

replace it with what ?

i'm impartial.  i like both, made a manpage maker, would like a good 
info editor haven't come across yet.  coolman in nonfree, tkinfo is 
free. debian won't allow manpages on it's user groups

do you know anything about this standoff between the online page and 
online manual systems ?

are you saying that whatever microbsd prefers should be the base of bsd ?

is microbsd used by Apple or something ?


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list