UFS related panic (daily <-> find)

[Adam Vande More]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:50 PM, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> wrote:

> Same drill as before, see what instruction this is.  Actually, this looks
> to
> be in the same location as your last panic, so a NULL pointer is 0x1
> instead
> of 0x0 again.  In my experience, this would still indicate failing RAM to
> me,
> memtest86+ notwithstanding (memtest86+ is single threaded AFAIK, so it may
> not stress the hardware quite the same, e.g. if the error is heat related,
> etc.).


memtest* cannot conclusively diagnose a dimm as good.  Usually the only
practical solution is to swap modules with known good ones.

-- 
Adam Vande More