RFC: Big Makefile patch for WARNS settings
Gabor Kovesdan
gabor at FreeBSD.org
Mon Oct 12 09:57:11 UTC 2009
Ed Schouten escribió:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> * Ulrich Spörlein <uqs at spoerlein.net> wrote:
>
>> Comments? Committers?
>>
>
> Wouldn't it better to address the root of the problem while there? ;-)
>
What I noticed is that the patch sets WARNS?=0 for a lot of utilities,
which actually have higher WARNS-compliance. Even if we don't "address
the root of the problem" right now, it would be nice to elaborate and
set each WARNS level at the higher value possible.For example,
usr.bin/ul is marked as 0 by the patch but it seems to me it is WARNS=6
clean. I don't know the last sources, though, but I'm sure it will
compile with at least WARNS=3.
--
Gabor Kovesdan
FreeBSD Volunteer
EMAIL: gabor at FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor at kovesdan.org
WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list