ltverhack problem

Joe Marcus Clarke marcus at marcuscom.com
Fri Feb 24 11:47:17 PST 2006


On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:39 -0800, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Ade just pointed out (and i observed it myself as well) that a lot of
> MC-gnome ports currently get marked BROKEN because the change from
> USE_AUTOOLS=libtool:15 to GNU_AUTOCONF=yes breaks the "ltverhack without
> libtool" integrity check, since libtool is apparently now no longer
> explicitely marked as a dependency.
> 
> Would there be a way to make ltverhack smarter to handle this changem,
> do we need to explicitely put USE_AUTOTOOLS=libtool:15 back in, or
> should we remove the "ltverhack without libtool" check entirely ?

How is this working in the FreeBSD ports tree?  The same check exists
there, and there are ports using ltverhack in the tree.

Joe

> 
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/attachments/20060224/43cee1ce/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-gnome mailing list